Jill Stein officially files for Wisconsin Recount
25 Nov

Jill Stein officially files for Wisconsin Recount

Last gasp effort which may have effect of legitimizing Trump’s win.

Jill Stein, Green Party candidate, officially has filed for a recount of the presidential election in Wisconsin.

rocky2016_jill-stein-officially-files-wisconsin-recount-01

The Wisconsin Elections Commission posted the following statement on its website:

MADISON, WI – The Wisconsin Elections Commission today received two recount petitions from the Jill Stein for President Campaign and from Rocky Roque De La Fuente, Administrator Michael Haas announced.

“The Commission is preparing to move forward with a statewide recount of votes for President of the United States, as requested by these candidates,” Haas said.

“We have assembled an internal team to direct the recount, we have been in close consultation with our county clerk partners, and have arranged for legal representation by the Wisconsin Department of Justice,” Haas said. “We plan to hold a teleconference meeting for county clerks next week and anticipate the recount will begin late in the week after the Stein campaign has paid the recount fee, which we are still calculating.”

The last statewide recount was of the Supreme Court election in 2011. At that time, the Associated Press surveyed county clerks and reported that costs to the counties exceeded $520,000, though several counties did not respond to the AP’s survey. That election had 1.5 million votes, and Haas said the Commission expects the costs to be higher for an election with 2.975 million votes. “The Commission is in the process of obtaining cost estimates from county clerks so that we can calculate the fee which the campaigns will need to pay before the recount can start,” Haas said. The Commission will need to determine how the recount costs will be assessed to the campaigns.

The state is working under a federal deadline of December 13 to complete the recount. As a result, county boards of canvassers may need to work evenings and weekends to meet the deadlines. “The recount process is very detail-oriented, and this deadline will certainly challenge some counties to finish on time,” Haas said.

A recount is different than an audit and is more rigorous, Haas explained. More than 100 reporting units across the state were randomly selected for a separate audit of their voting equipment as required by state law, and that process has already begun. Electronic voting equipment audits determine whether all properly-marked ballots are accurately tabulated by the equipment. In a recount, all ballots (including those that were originally hand counted) are examined to determine voter intent before being retabulated. In addition, the county boards of canvassers will examine other documents, including poll lists, written absentee applications, rejected absentee ballots, and provisional ballots before counting the votes.

Haas noted that the Commission’s role is to order the recount, to provide legal guidance to the counties during the recount, and to certify the results. If the candidates disagree with the results of the recount, the law gives them the right to appeal in circuit court within five business days after the recount is completed. The circuit court is where issues are resolved that may be discovered during the recount but are not resolved to the satisfaction of the candidates.

“Wisconsin has the most decentralized election system in the United States,” Haas said. “The system has strong local control coupled with state oversight, resting on the partnership between the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the 72 county clerks, and the 1,854 municipal clerks. State law clearly gives each county’s Board of Canvassers the primary authority to conduct the recount, and to decide which ballots should and should not be counted. Recounting votes is an open, transparent process in which each of the candidates may have representatives present to raise objections, and where the public may be present to observe.”

Official results from all 72 counties indicate the presidential candidates received the following vote totals:

rocky2016_jill-stein-officially-files-wisconsin-recount-02

Stein has raised a reported $7 million to fund a recount effort in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Today was the deadline to file in Wisconsin.

There had been a lot of speculation that the fundraising was some sort of scam to fund the Green Party, but at least in Wisconsin Stein seems to have followed through.

rocky2016_jill-stein-officially-files-wisconsin-recount-03

Wisconsin has 13 days to complete the recount

While the recount demand is desperate, and is cheered by many Clinton supporters, it may have the unintended consequence of legitimizing Trump’s win. No longer will Democrats be able to spread conspiracy theories about hacking of computers and statistical anomalies.

A lot of Clinton supporters blame Stein for Clinton’s close loss in several swing states, and are somewhat bitter:

rocky2016_jill-stein-officially-files-wisconsin-recount-04

For some perspective on the original count being off by over 20,000 votes in order to change the result, consider the 2011 recount in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election between Joanne Kloppenburg and David Prosser. The recount changed only about 300 votes in the count, out of approximately 1.5 million cast. About 3 million votes were cast in the 2016 Wisconsin presidential election, so assuming the same error rate, that would be about 600 vote change.

rocky2016_jill-stein-officially-files-wisconsin-recount-05

Source: http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/11/jill-stein-officially-files-for-wisconsin-recount/

Posted on November 25, 2016 by William A. Jacobson

Leave a Reply